Step Up 3D Review

Friday night me and the girlfriend laid low and took in a flick. This time we decided to go check out Step Up 3D. I know what you're thinking, how is a manly man like myself going to be caught dead at a movie like Step Up 3D, but then you realize that I went with my girlfriend and you're like, alright then... Honestly, I still wanted to see it. I've seen the first two and they aren't the worst movies in the world and I actually find the dancing stuff pretty cool, which is odd because I can't dance for shit. But enough about why I went to see the movie, let's talk about the actual movie and the 3D aspect of it.

The movie follows Moose (Adam Sevani) who you probably recognized from Step Up 2: The Streets (as well as an episode of Fantasy Factory). He's a very talented dancer, not the greatest actor in the world, but let's be honest most people aren't coming to these movies for the acting. So the movie follows him as he goes off to college at NYU with his best friend Camile, played by Alyson Stoner who you may recognize from the original Step Up where she played Channing Tatum's little sister or maybe from the Missy Elliot videos with the little kid break dancers. She's always been around when you see little kids dancing in videos, but now she's all grown up. So both of them are at NYU and Moose is there to study engineering, not dance, but of course he's instantly brought back into the dance scene by The Pirates, lead by Luke (who looks like Ashton Kutcher's doppelganger).  Luke brings him into this dance world that he's created and they all start dancing together until the bank comes to take away their practice space, so of course they have to enter the big dance competition in order to make the money they need to pay back the bank. And that's the gist of it. There's a few different side story aspects of it and more people get involved, but for the sake of argument, that's the plot. So with that out of the way, let's talk about the actual movie itself and the 3D.

First of all I couldn't believe that this movie is directed by the same guy that directed Step Up 2... I thought 2 was decent, but this one just seemed like it was shot weird. I understand that it was shot in 3D so they needed to make a few changes here and there in order to promote the 3D aspect of it, but some of the camera angles and movement just seemed amateur to me. There were also quite a few times when the actors are looking directly at the camera and talking/dancing, when I don't feel like they should have been. There were some aspects of the movie where Luke is filming a dance video and there are people talking to the camera, but you know when those parts are because there's a border around the screen to make it look like a video camera, but these scenes I'm referring to didn't have that and it just seemed out of place. I did get why they did it at a few other parts during the dance battles because it added to the 3D aspect, but I still felt it was weird.

Since I brought it up, let's talk about the 3D. I've written about 3D movie in the past and I still stand by what I've said... I don't like it. For one, I have a small head so the glasses never fit me properly so every time I would sit back in my chair, the arms of the glasses would hit the headrest and they'd basically fall off my nose. Also, I don't like watching a movie through sunglasses. It dulls out the colors of the movie and just annoys me when I know the scene is supposed to be vibrant, yet the glasses make it look terrible. And the main thing I hate about 3D movies is the ghosting. I just don't think the technology is quite there yet. The screen isn't 100% clear when watching it through the glasses, especially in a movie like this that has a ton of movement, everything just starts to blur. There were a few cool scenes where 1 dancer at a time would be featured in the frame doing some isolations or whatnot, and that looked really cool, but when the whole group is dancing and there's so much going on it was more annoying than anything. There were also some points where you could tell they were doing things just because it was in 3D and I don't really care for that either. The one thing about 3D that I do like is that it adds a ton of depth to the scenes that don't have a lot of motion. There's one scene in particular where Luke is sitting on a rooftop that looks out at the Brooklyn Bridge and the New York skyline and it looked incredible because of the 3D, I actually felt like I was sitting with him on the rooftop. But other than that one scene, nothing else really impressed me.

Now that's not to say that it was a bad effort. I think it was done much better than something like Clash of the Titans or The Last Airbender (especially since Step Up was shot in 3D and not a conversion), but I still don't think the technology is where it needs to be for the mass market.

To wrap things up, the movie itself was entertaining. The acting was a little 'meh', but the dancing and the music were really cool and let's be honest that's what people are going to see. Nobody gives a shit if the main character hasn't been in any other movies, he's not trying to win an oscar here. So if you're looking for cool dance moves and some good music, and an interesting take on 3D, then I would suggest checking it out. But don't worry, if you don't get to see it in 3D in the theater I think it will hold up just fine in 2D once it hits blu-ray.

Tagged with:
 

My Top 30 “Horror” Movies From 2000-2009

Since we're rapidly closing in on 2010 I thought I'd take this opportunity to run down my Top 30 list of what I felt were the best "horror" movies from 2000-2009 (plus a few honorable mentions). I say "horror" in quotes because some of these are not just straight up horror as most people would know it as. There are some that involve comedy and drama and sometimes more "thriller" aspects as opposed to horror, but I still consider them to be mostly horror by nature. Most of these are pretty mainstream movies, but there are a handful of smaller productions. So lets get to it.

30. Hatchet (2006) (IMDB)

29. Frailty (2002) (IMDB)

28. American Psycho (2000) (IMDB)

27. The Orphanage (2007) (IMDB)

26. Hannibal (2001) (IMDB)

25. Jeepers Creepers (2001) (IMDB)

24 through 1 after the jump

(more...)

DVD & Blu-Ray Releases for August 4, 2009

Here are the DVD and Blu-Ray releases for Tuesday August 4th, 2009. I know I haven't been posting the releases lately, but I'll try to start doing them again. Not a whole lot coming out this week, Race to Witch Mountain and The Soloist, neither of which I've seen as well as Big Trouble In Little China on Blu-Ray, which is always a good one to watch. So what are you guys picking up this week, if anything?

DVD Releases

Blu-Ray Releases

Underrated and Under Appreciated Movies

Over the years I have watched quite a few movies, some good, some bad, and some down right terrible. I own over 1000 DVD's, some of which were a waste of money but thankfully I discovered Netflix and have saved myself quite a bit of cash lately. So I figured I'd do a small rundown of some semi-mainstream/random movies that I feel are quite underrated and under appreciated today. Now these are just my opinions and you may think that some of the movies I've listed are actually great movies or maybe you think they are terrible, that's your opinion. Some of these may just be low budget movies that never got the mainstream attention that maybe they deserved, but couldn't afford. Or they could just be movies that I enjoyed and my friends didn't like or maybe never even heard of.

Either way this is just a small list that I put together based on the movies I own (it was the easiest list of movies I have access to at the moment), so I'm sure there are other movies that I would agree with you on and if you post them in the comments I may amend my post here to include your suggestions. And of course I'll give a little description of the movie and why I feel it was underrated. So head on through the jump and check out the list.

(more...)

Kids Turn To Smoking Because of Movies, Apparently

If you haven't heard the latest news regarding smoking and entertainment there is a group out there that wants any movie that shows people smoking in it, to be rated R, no matter what. If there is any cigarette on screen in someone's mouth the movie gets an R, plain and simple. Obviously I think this is ridiculous as do a lot of people, but this group seems to think that Wolverine having a cigar in his mouth for 2 scenes of a movie (when in the comics there is almost always a cigar in his mouth) is going to cause younger kids to want to smoke. 

Personally I never took up smoking, a good majority of my friends did and even a lot of my family smokes or used to smoke and guess what, I've probably seen a lot more movies than any of my family and friends. Never once have I ever recalled wanting to have a cigarette after seeing someone in a movie smoke. This is just a ridiculous way for people to blame someone else for their kids smoking. What's next, are they going to start making movies refrain from showing alcohol on screen in a PG-13 movie? They might as well if they are trying to get smoking banned from movies. Alcohol causes quite a few deaths each day itself, and a lot of them are much more violent than death from cigarettes. I guess casually having a beer in a PG-13 movie is much better for you than casually having a cigarette... 

These groups that are lashing out against entertainment need to learn where the real problem is coming from, the parents. If you were a good parent and explained the dangers of smoking, drinking, etc to your kids as they are growing up they are going to be a lot less likely to start. Now obviously you can inform them of the dangers and a lot of kids are still going to try them, and some will do it more than others, but if they are aware of the dangers before hand, a movie character is not going to be the reason they start. I would bet to guess that most kids start smoking because of the human influences around them more than from a fictional movie character. If people in your family smoke or their friends smoke they are more likely to try it because of the way they look up to or admire those people, not because Wolverine is holding a cigar in his mouth for a few scenes in a movie. 

At 13 years old I think kids should already know about the dangers of smoking and peer pressure. I recall these things being jammed down my throat at that point in my life. So if you're trying to blame the entertainment industry for the things your kids may be doing you need to take a step back and look at the big picture. Kids today have a lot more going on than even I did as a kid and I'm not that old. And for the people that are starting these groups to censor the entertainment their kids experience, why don't you take the time you're wasting doing that and talk to your kids once and a while. It's your responsibility as a parent to teach your kids what's right and wrong, movies should not be raising your children. Maybe you shouldn't have had kids if you're just going to pass the blame on to someone (or something) else when your kid fucks up.

Tagged with:
 
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes